Ooh... I was watching the news...and apparently...gay marriage is now legal in all of Canada...What are your thoughts?
Philosophia- 07-21-2005
Really? If it's true, I'm glad.
Dumda- 07-21-2005
Go Canada!!
Nightshade- 07-21-2005
Re: Ooh... I was watching the news...and apparently...gay marriage is now legal in all of Canada...What are your thoughts?
I'll say ok, not much I can and if its abolished I'll let god handle that.. -_-
Dean- 07-21-2005
I think its good.
┤AL13ND├- 07-21-2005
Hmm... now maybe my country will realize we're all a bunch of homophobes.
Miss Padfoot- 07-21-2005
Yay for Canada.
Dean- 07-21-2005
Is isn't much of a debate. :lol:
Greenfly- 07-21-2005
Woo Canada. 2 questions.
1. Are places of worship required to comply?
2. Is it actually called marriage, or another name like civil unions?
Nightshade- 07-24-2005
Woo Canada. 2 questions.
1. Are places of worship required to comply?
2. Is it actually called marriage, or another name like civil unions?
Yes its called marriage and places of worship don't ever have to comply even in cases of straight couples. (divorces and the such) though I beleive no ohmosexual would have trouble finding a church. Canada is pretty liberal after all..
Dean- 07-25-2005
United States
In the United States as of April 2005, only the state of Massachusetts recognizes same-sex marriages, while the states of Vermont, Maine, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia offer same-sex partners benefits similar to those of legally married couples. Eighteen other States have constitutional provisions that limit marriages to one man and one woman, while twenty-five States have statutes containing similar definitions. In the United States, the debate over whether or not to make same sex marriages legally binding remains one of the most polarizing and divisive political debates of the early 21st century. During 2004, 13 US States amended their constitutions to define marriage as being only between one man and one woman and 14 attempted to do so but failed. President George W. Bush backs an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriages. The amendment failed passage in 2004. In November of 2004 the President announced he supported civil unions.<WOW! Really? I had no idea! I guess progress is being make. At least we don't have the death penalty for gays like Iran dose...
Nightshade- 07-25-2005
United States
In the United States as of April 2005, only the state of Massachusetts recognizes same-sex marriages, while the states of Vermont, Maine, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia offer same-sex partners benefits similar to those of legally married couples. Eighteen other States have constitutional provisions that limit marriages to one man and one woman, while twenty-five States have statutes containing similar definitions. In the United States, the debate over whether or not to make same sex marriages legally binding remains one of the most polarizing and divisive political debates of the early 21st century. During 2004, 13 US States amended their constitutions to define marriage as being only between one man and one woman and 14 attempted to do so but failed. President George W. Bush backs an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriages. The amendment failed passage in 2004. In November of 2004 the President announced he supported civil unions.<WOW! Really? I had no idea! I guess progress is being make. At least we don't have the death penalty for gays like Iran dose...
At least Iran doesn't nuke everything -_-
Dean- 07-25-2005
United States
In the United States as of April 2005, only the state of Massachusetts recognizes same-sex marriages, while the states of Vermont, Maine, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia offer same-sex partners benefits similar to those of legally married couples. Eighteen other States have constitutional provisions that limit marriages to one man and one woman, while twenty-five States have statutes containing similar definitions. In the United States, the debate over whether or not to make same sex marriages legally binding remains one of the most polarizing and divisive political debates of the early 21st century. During 2004, 13 US States amended their constitutions to define marriage as being only between one man and one woman and 14 attempted to do so but failed. President George W. Bush backs an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriages. The amendment failed passage in 2004. In November of 2004 the President announced he supported civil unions.<WOW! Really? I had no idea! I guess progress is being make. At least we don't have the death penalty for gays like Iran dose...
At least Iran doesn't nuke everything -_-
-_- You should get an award for going completely off topic and your preaching your "I hate Bush" campagin to the wrong crowd. :lol:
Miss Padfoot- 07-25-2005
United States
In the United States as of April 2005, only the state of Massachusetts recognizes same-sex marriages, while the states of Vermont, Maine, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia offer same-sex partners benefits similar to those of legally married couples. Eighteen other States have constitutional provisions that limit marriages to one man and one woman, while twenty-five States have statutes containing similar definitions. In the United States, the debate over whether or not to make same sex marriages legally binding remains one of the most polarizing and divisive political debates of the early 21st century. During 2004, 13 US States amended their constitutions to define marriage as being only between one man and one woman and 14 attempted to do so but failed. President George W. Bush backs an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriages. The amendment failed passage in 2004. In November of 2004 the President announced he supported civil unions.<WOW! Really? I had no idea! I guess progress is being make. At least we don't have the death penalty for gays like Iran dose...
At least Iran doesn't nuke everything -_-The last time we actually used "nukes" was sixty years ago next month.
Thank you for playing. Please try again.
Dean- 07-26-2005
United States
In the United States as of April 2005, only the state of Massachusetts recognizes same-sex marriages, while the states of Vermont, Maine, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Connecticut, and the District of Columbia offer same-sex partners benefits similar to those of legally married couples. Eighteen other States have constitutional provisions that limit marriages to one man and one woman, while twenty-five States have statutes containing similar definitions. In the United States, the debate over whether or not to make same sex marriages legally binding remains one of the most polarizing and divisive political debates of the early 21st century. During 2004, 13 US States amended their constitutions to define marriage as being only between one man and one woman and 14 attempted to do so but failed. President George W. Bush backs an amendment to the federal Constitution banning same-sex marriages. The amendment failed passage in 2004. In November of 2004 the President announced he supported civil unions.<WOW! Really? I had no idea! I guess progress is being make. At least we don't have the death penalty for gays like Iran dose...
At least Iran doesn't nuke everything -_-The last time we actually used "nukes" was sixty years ago next month.
Thank you for playing. Please try again.
XD You just have a way of making me laugh! :lol:
Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.